Wisconsin OWI/DUI defense

Homicide by Intoxicated Use of a Vehicle in Wisconsin: § 940.09 (Class D / Class C Felony)

Under Wis. Stat. § 940.09, operating a motor vehicle (or other listed conveyance) while intoxicated, with a prohibited alcohol concentration, or with a detectable restricted controlled substance and causing the death of another person is the most serious OWI-adjacent offense in Wisconsin law. The base charge is a Class D felony with up to 25 years of imprisonment and a $100,000 fine, and a mandatory 5-year initial-confinement minimum. With a prior counted under § 343.307(2), it elevates to a Class C felony with up to 40 years. License revocation runs 5 years (10 if a passenger under 16 was present), and permanent revocation under § 343.31(1m) is the standard outcome on most cases above the threshold.

Cafferty & Scheidegger OWI/DUI defense attorneys serving southeast Wisconsin
Best Law Office in Racine 2025 | Cafferty & Scheidegger OWI/DUI defense

Best Law Office

Racine 2025

4.9

Client Rating

642+ Google reviews

30+

Years Defending

Southeast Wisconsin

3

Counties Covered

Racine · Kenosha · Walworth

Wisconsin's most serious OWI-adjacent offense

Wisconsin Statute § 940.09 criminalizes causing the death of another person while operating a vehicle (or, under (1g), a firearm or airgun) in any of the impaired conditions defined elsewhere in OWI law. The statute is structured into multiple subsections covering the four impairment theories (intoxicated, restricted controlled substance, PAC, commercial vehicle BAC), and parallel "(c)-(e)" subsections for cases involving an unborn child.

Penalty structure

Offense variant Felony class Max imprisonment Max fine Mandatory minimum
§ 940.09(1c)(a) - base offense Class D 25 years $100,000 5 years initial confinement (court may reduce only with compelling reason on record)
§ 940.09(1c)(b) - with prior under § 343.307(2) Class C 40 years $100,000 5 years initial confinement
§ 940.09(1g) - firearm/airgun variant Class D 25 years $100,000 None specified

License consequences

The § 940.09(2) affirmative defense

Wisconsin Statute § 940.09(2)(a) provides:

"The defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the death would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant."

This affirmative defense is unique to § 940.09 (and the parallel § 940.25 injury statute). It shifts the burden to the defense to prove by a preponderance - not beyond a reasonable doubt - that the intoxication did not causally contribute to the death.

In practice, this defense lives or dies on accident-reconstruction expert testimony. The defense must show that the death would have occurred even if the defendant had been sober and using due care. Cases where the defense has succeeded typically involve sudden, unavoidable events: a pedestrian darting into traffic, an intoxicated other driver running a light, a mechanical failure, or a road condition that no reasonable driver could have avoided.

Defense workflow

  1. Day 1: Independent scene investigation. Wisconsin § 940.09 cases require accident-reconstruction work that begins at the scene if possible, before evidence is moved or destroyed.
  2. Within 10 days (if applicable): File the refusal-hearing request under § 343.305(9) before the deadline runs.
  3. Pretrial: Suppression motions on the stop, arrest, and chemical test. Independent toxicology review of the blood draw and lab analysis. Causation analysis using accident-reconstruction experts.
  4. Affirmative-defense development: Build the § 940.09(2)(a) "would have happened anyway" defense from independent reconstruction, biomechanics, and witness analysis. The defense bears the preponderance burden, so the development must be thorough.
  5. Plea negotiation (where appropriate): Negotiate toward reduced charges (e.g., § 940.25 injury OWI when the death-causation element is genuinely contested) or toward a sentence below the 5-year mandatory minimum where compelling-reason mitigation supports it.
  6. Trial preparation: Jury trial is a constitutional right. § 940.09 cases that proceed to trial typically center on causation experts and the affirmative-defense framework.

How common is a Wisconsin § 940.09 charge?

Sources: WI DOT 2024 Wisconsin Traffic Crash Facts · WI DOT Traffic Convictions 10-year summary · WI LFB Informational Paper #62, January 2025

§ 940.09 cases require immediate, sophisticated defense work. The mandatory 5-year initial-confinement minimum, the 5- to 10-year license revocation (or permanent revocation when combined with priors), and the lifetime federal firearm prohibition all attach automatically on conviction. Independent accident reconstruction, the § 940.09(2)(a) affirmative defense, and rigorous chemical-test challenges are the defense work that matters. Call (262) 632-5000 24/7. We serve Racine, Kenosha, and Walworth counties.

Representative outcomes

OWI results start with the issue we can challenge

The goal is not to explain the penalty after it happens. The goal is to find the fact, statute, prior record, or testing issue that can reduce or prevent the consequence before the case resolves.

See representative OWI results

Where Homicide by intoxicated use § 940.09 cases are heard across our 3-county service area

These cases are filed at the county circuit court level. Below are the currently elected District Attorneys and the size of each county's circuit court bench. Full roster on each county hub.

Racine County

District Attorney: Tricia Hanson verify →

9 currently sitting circuit court judges - see the Racine County hub for the full roster, branch assignments, and county-specific OWI stats.

Bench data verified 2026-05-03

Kenosha County

District Attorney: Xavier Solis verify →

8 currently sitting circuit court judges - see the Kenosha County hub for the full roster, branch assignments, and county-specific OWI stats.

Bench data verified 2026-05-03

Walworth County

District Attorney: Zeke Wiedenfeld verify →

4 currently sitting circuit court judges - see the Walworth County hub for the full roster, branch assignments, and county-specific OWI stats.

Bench data verified 2026-05-03

Frequently asked questions

What felony class is homicide by intoxicated use of a vehicle?
Class D felony for the base offense. Under Wis. Stat. § 940.09(1c)(a), a violation of § 940.09(1) is a Class D felony, which under § 939.50(3)(d) carries up to 25 years of imprisonment and a $100,000 fine. The same subsection imposes a mandatory minimum 5-year initial confinement: "the term of confinement in prison portion of the bifurcated sentence shall be at least 5 years except that a court may impose a term of confinement that is less than 5 years if the court finds a compelling reason and places its reason on the record."
What if I have a prior OWI on my record?
The charge elevates to a Class C felony. Under Wis. Stat. § 940.09(1c)(b), the offense becomes a Class C felony "if the person has one or more prior convictions, suspensions, or revocations, as counted under s. 343.307(2)." Class C carries up to 40 years of imprisonment and a $100,000 fine under § 939.50(3)(c). The 5-year mandatory minimum from (1c)(a) carries forward.
How does Wisconsin define the elements of § 940.09?
Three elements: (1) the defendant operated or handled a vehicle (or under § 940.09(1g), a firearm or airgun); (2) while in one of the impaired conditions specified in § 940.09(1)(a)-(e) - under the influence, with detectable restricted controlled substance, with PAC ≥ .08, or with a commercial vehicle BAC of .04 to less than .08; (3) the operation caused the death of another person (or, under (1)(c)-(e), an unborn child). Each element must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Is there an affirmative defense?
Yes. Under Wis. Stat. § 940.09(2)(a), "the defendant has a defense if he or she proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the death would have occurred even if he or she had been exercising due care and he or she had not been under the influence of an intoxicant." This is the same "would have happened anyway" defense available under the parallel injury statute § 940.25(2)(a). It shifts the burden to the defense to prove that intoxication did not causally contribute to the death. Reconstruction expert testimony is essential.
Can I be charged with both § 940.09 and a regular OWI for the same incident?
Yes. The prosecution typically charges § 940.09 alongside the underlying § 346.63(1) OWI charge from the same incident. Whether multiple convictions enter at sentencing is a double-jeopardy / multiplicity question that depends on the specific charging combination. § 940.09 is a stand-alone felony triggered by causing death, regardless of OWI prior count.
What is the license revocation length?
Five years for the standard offense under Wis. Stat. § 343.31(3)(c). The revocation doubles to 10 years if a passenger under 16 was in the vehicle (or if an unborn child is involved under §§ 940.09(c)-(e)). And under § 343.31(1m)(b), a § 940.09 conviction combined with priors counted under § 343.307(1) reaching 4 or more total triggers permanent revocation. Reinstatement after permanent revocation is possible no sooner than 10 years later under § 343.38.
Does a § 940.09 conviction count as a prior for future OWI charging?
Yes. Under Wis. Stat. § 343.307(1)(c), convictions for § 940.09 (and § 940.25 and § 346.63(2)) count as priors for § 346.65(2) tier enhancement. A § 940.09 conviction is itself a counted prior for any future Wisconsin OWI charge, on top of being a felony in its own right.
What are the federal firearm consequences?
A § 940.09 Class D or Class C felony conviction triggers the lifetime federal firearm prohibition under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and the parallel state prohibition under Wis. Stat. § 941.29. Possession of any firearm or ammunition after conviction is itself a federal Class C felony carrying up to 10 years in prison. Restoration requires either a Wisconsin gubernatorial pardon or federal § 925(c) relief (currently unfunded and practically unavailable). For § 940.09 defendants, the firearm prohibition is one of the most durable consequences after the prison term ends.
Is there a valid-prescription defense for restricted controlled substances?
For specific substances, yes. Under Wis. Stat. § 940.09(2)(b), a valid-prescription defense applies for methamphetamine, GHB, and delta-9-THC. The defendant must prove valid prescription by a preponderance of the evidence. The defense does not apply to other restricted controlled substances or to alcohol-only § 940.09 cases.
Can a court sentence below the 5-year mandatory minimum?
Only with a compelling reason placed on the record. Under § 940.09(1c)(a), the 5-year initial-confinement minimum can be reduced "if the court finds a compelling reason and places its reason on the record." Compelling-reason departures are exceptional and require a substantial mitigation package: defendant cooperation, victim-family input supporting reduction, treatment progress, and similar factors. The reduction is reviewable on appeal.

Your defense team

Every case is worked directly by a named attorney from first call through final disposition. You will never be handed off to a paralegal or rotated through associates. Your attorney knows your case because they built it.

Patrick K. Cafferty, founding partner and OWI/DUI defense attorney in Racine, Wisconsin

Patrick K. Cafferty

Founding Partner

Marquette Law graduate defending OWI and criminal cases across southeast Wisconsin for over 32 years. Named a Wisconsin Super Lawyer® 18 consecutive years and rated AV Preeminent® by Martindale-Hubbell.

Full bio →
Jillian J. Scheidegger, partner handling OWI/DUI and criminal defense across southeast Wisconsin

Jillian J. Scheidegger

Partner

Partner since 2013 handling criminal defense and OWI matters for adults and juveniles. Marquette Law graduate, Wisconsin Super Lawyer®, and President-Elect of the Racine County Bar Association.

Full bio →
Carl Johnson, OWI/DUI trial attorney practicing in Racine, Kenosha, and Walworth counties

Carl Johnson

Attorney

Marquette Law 2006, UW-Madison undergrad. Extensive trial experience including first-degree homicide and sexual assault defense. Racine native practicing in Racine, Kenosha, and Walworth counties.

Full bio →
Juan S. Ramirez, bilingual OWI/DUI defense attorney and former public defender

Juan S. Ramirez

Attorney

Michigan State Law graduate and former Racine County Public Defender. Bilingual English/Spanish. Won the WACDL Hanson Memorial Advocate Prize for a homicide acquittal. Advises on how criminal charges affect immigration status.

Full bio →

Charged in a specific county?

Local courthouse posture changes the defense strategy. Pick your county for prosecutor tendencies, courthouse logistics, and our local experience.

Beyond OWI: the full practice

Cafferty & Scheidegger is a full-service criminal defense firm. This microsite covers OWI specifically; for the larger practice, case results, attorney bios, and all other practice areas, visit the main site.